Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24 (1948), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a federal court from enforcing restrictive covenants that would prohibit a person from owning or occupying property based on race or color. A companion case to Shelley v. Kraemer, Hurd v. Hodge involved racially restrictive covenants on houses in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C..[1]
| Hurd v. Hodge | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Argued January 15–16, 1948 Decided May 3, 1948 | |
| Full case name | Hurd et al. v. Hodge et al., Urciolo et al. v. Same |
| Citations | 334 U.S. 24 (more) 68 S. Ct. 847; 92 L. Ed. 2d 1187 |
| Holding | |
| The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a federal court from enforcing restrictive covenants that would prohibit a person from owning or occupying property based on race or color. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Vinson, joined by Black, Douglas, Murphy, Burton |
| Concurrence | Frankfurter |
| Reed, Jackson and Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 334
- Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), a companion case to Hurd v. Hodge
External links
Works related to Hurd v. Hodge at Wikisource- Text of Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24 (1948) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.
